One of several photos I took at our cathedral before the archbishop’s service for catechumens and candidates. We have over 400 people entering full communion with the Church this Easter! The light streaming in from on high could not have been more appropriate for this day. How awesome is God, and how beautiful is the Faith!
There are two ideas that I encounter over and over again in my conversations with non-Catholic Christians. The first idea is that, for whatever reason, the Catholic Church does not possess apostolic authority. The second is that Christians should only believe what can be explicitly found in scripture, because the Bible is the final authority. I would like to reflect on these two ideas that I myself once held.
If apostolic authority died with the last Apostle, then no one has apostolic authority. No Catholic, no Protestant, no Evangelical or Fundamentalist has apostolic authority. Hence, no one since the Apostles has had the authority to tell anyone what to believe or what not to believe about the Bible, including its contents.
The early Christians had to believe what the Apostles told them. But, the Apostles died. So, what happened to their authority? How could they continue to “tell” Christians what to believe? How would the Holy Spirit guide and unify the Church without the Apostles? Here are a few options: 1) Apostolic authority was transferred to the successors of the Apostles. 2) Apostolic authority was transferred to the Bible. 3) A combination of the two.
If authority was transferred only to the Apostles’ successors, then there would be little point in writing things down (like the Gospels, for example). So there must be at least some apostolic authority contained within the writings of the Apostles. After all, if the Apostle has authority, his writings will, too.
If authority was transferred only to the writings of the Apostles, then it would make sense to include that information in the writings. For example, the apostles should have written down something that says, “When we are all dead, our authority will reside only in these written documents” or, “Only believe what is explicitly written in this future collection of writings and nothing else,” or “The Bible is now your final authority.” The problem is that the Bible makes no claim that it is the final authority for the Christian upon the death of the last apostle or at any other point in time. Although the Bible claims to be “profitable” it does not claim to have “the final say” or to be entirely “sufficient.” Plus, the Church went 400 years without an officially assembled Bible.
Non-Catholic Christians (with few exceptions) have largely rejected the idea that the authority of the Apostles was transferred to successors. Therefore, unlike the early Christians, there are no men that these Christians are ultimately accountable to. They are essentially free to discern the Bible on their own and believe what they wish. If they disagree with one church, they can find a different one. While many of them claim submission to their respective church leadership, there is really no reason for them to do so in matters of faith and morals. Why submit to leadership when each Christian can decide what to believe? “Leadership” therefore becomes limited to the logistical and administrative needs of each church. In this scenario, apostolic authority on faith and morals (limited now to only the Bible) takes a back seat to the beliefs of individual Christians. Christians now tend to submit to leadership that aligns with what they believe. This is the opposite of the early Church where individual Christians were expected to line up with the unified teaching of the Apostles.
Catholics, believing that the Apostles transferred their Christ-given authority to successors, are expected to behave as the early Christians did. They are expected to fall in line with God’s written Word as well as the teachings delivered by men with apostolic authority. In this scenario, apostolic authority is still in the driver’s seat. Individual Christians are expected to remain in the back seat and submit to the teachings of Church leadership, just like when the apostles were alive. In other words, the apostles “live on” in their successors who are able to clarify their writings and apply them to the present day life of the Church. This has continued for 2000 years.
The authentic Catholic Christian, like the early Christian does not search for a church that aligns with his or her individual conclusions about the Bible. Rather, like the early Christians, the authentic Catholic is obedient to Christ through obedience to Christ’s Church (which includes the Bible). The Bible is not the “container” which holds all things Christian. The Church is the “container” which holds all things Christian, and the Bible is inside that container (aka the Deposit of Faith). The Bible points the Christian back to the Church as the “pillar and ground of the truth.” (1Tim 3:15) The Bible never places itself over and above the Church’s authority, or demands that the Christian reject the Church and submit only to the authority of Bible. The Bible and the Church together are a coordinated, apostolic authority. It is not either/or, it is both/and.
The Catholic Church must possess apostolic authority in order to have assembled and affirmed the contents of the Bible 400 years after the Apostles died. The Catholic Church declared which writings were inspired and which were not. It makes no sense to reject the apostolic authority of the Catholic Church and then claim that the Bible contains apostolic authority for the Christian. It is inconsistent to say, “I only believe what is in the Bible, but I don’t believe that the Church that assembled that Bible has apostolic authority.” That is akin to saying, “I believe the Gospel of John, but I don’t believe John had apostolic authority.”
Assembling the Bible was as important as writing the Bible. Without the Church’s apostolic authority, we could all pick and choose whether or not we think the book of James or the Gospel of Thomas belongs in the New Testament. Why not rely only on the words spoken by Jesus in Matthew’s Gospel? Why not accept Peter’s writings but reject Paul’s? When you dump the Catholic Church’s apostolic authority, everything else is up for grabs, including the Table of Contents of your Bible.
Apostolic authority was promised by Christ to the Church. It is not transient, it is permanent. It is not something that can be “lost” and then “picked up” by another church, for Jesus established only one Church and promised to remain with that Church. Bad people in the Church cannot cause apostolic authority to “go away.” It is the authority of Christ, given by Christ. Jesus never said that the authority given to the Apostles would someday go away or be confined to a book. The Apostles never taught that, either. They appointed new men to fill vacant offices (Acts 1:20-26).
If the Catholic Church does not have apostolic authority, then no one has apostolic authority. That authority died with the Apostles, and the Bible doesn’t have it, either. It’s just a collection of old writings that may or may not have been inspired by God, put together by a false religion that calls itself Christian. If that’s the case, it really doesn’t make sense to believe what is in the Bible. On the other hand, if the Catholic Church does have apostolic authority, then it is reasonable to believe the things that are explicitly stated in the Bible as well as all of the other official teachings of the Catholic Church. It’s all apostolic teaching.
Ultimately, for the Catholic, it comes down to trusting Christ to hold it all together in spite of our imperfections. “We have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.” (2Cor 4:7) Jesus, I trust in thee.
Yesterday I was on a men’s retreat at my parish. During lunch break one of the guys was looking at his phone and scrolling away. I asked him if he was looking at Facebook. “Yeah,” he said, “just killing some time.” I nodded my head. Then he said, “Facebook is kind of like standing in front of the refrigerator. You open it up and scan through it to see if anything looks good.” I laughed in agreement.
His comment reminded me of a talk I once heard from a priest who was teaching a class on Catholicism. The priest was introducing the idea that all of us have a built in longing for God, but we seek things other than God to appease that longing. He quoted St. Augustine as saying that “our hearts are restless, oh God, until they rest in you.” Then, he shared his own experience of something that is familiar to most of us. It is the tendency to open the refrigerator door and stand there looking for something, even when we’re not really hungry.
I think it was G.K. Chesterton who said, “Every man who ever knocked on the door of a brothel was looking for God, but he just didn’t realize it.” Whether it is the brothel door, the refrigerator door, the pantry door, the log in page of Facebook or any number of endeavors, we all look for something besides God to appease our longing for God. Actually, it’s not something but someone we are seeking. It is a longing that can only be satisfied by a relationship with God, for only God can provide the pure, unconditional love that we crave. If we seek that relationship in anything or anyone other than God, we will eventually find ourselves unfulfilled, frustrated or disappointed. We may even find ourselves addicted, constantly returning to that which can never fully satisfy, and that which ultimately leaves us empty and restless.
Close the refrigerator door. You’re letting all the cold air out.
I used to think that being Christian was all about leaving this world to be with God “up there” somewhere. In my mind, I had a vision of my soul leaving my dead body and floating up to Heaven to be with billions of other souls. There we would have an eternal, spiritual party worshiping God. At some point, my dead body would be all fixed up and reunited with my soul, but I didn’t really know why that mattered. The point of this present life was to leave this world behind and “get to Heaven.” Everything about the Christian life was “spiritual.” Matter didn’t really matter. In fact, matter was an obstacle that interfered with the spiritual. “Material” people were not “spiritual” people. I didn’t really see how the material and the spiritual were intimately connected by God’s design.
As a Catholic Christian, I now see things differently. Rather than focusing on me rising up to a spiritual Heaven, I see that Heaven has already descended and merged with the material world (including me). The incarnation is about God becoming a Jewish carpenter with a material, human body and human nature. Redemption is about all of material creation being made new. This transformation of creation is already happening. For example, it happens every time a person is baptized. The water (matter) is used by God to transform the person into a “new creature.” Baptism, like all the Sacraments, uses matter to affect God’s grace.
The connection of matter and spirit is also evident in the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist in the Catholic Mass. Baptized Christians look the same as other humans even though they are new creatures. In a similar way, bread and wine appear to be bread and wine even though they have been transformed into the body and blood of Christ. This is Heaven descending into the world of matter to transform it and heal it. We are material and spiritual beings. It only makes sense that we need to be fed by food that is both material and spiritual. Why do people accept God being physically present in the form of a Jewish carpenter but balk at God being physically present in the form of bread and wine? A look at Jesus under a microscope would reveal human flesh, but he is God. Under the microscope we see bread and wine, but it is his glorified flesh and blood. He is here!
I no longer focus on “getting to Heaven.” I focus on Heaven coming into this material world to transform it and me. This is what the incarnation is all about. This is what the Holy Eucharist is all about. After God created everything He said it was good. It is still good, but it needs healing. Jesus came to heal all of creation, including you and me.
The incarnation did not suddenly stop after Jesus ascended to Heaven and sent the Holy Spirit. He promised to send the Holy Spirit as a teacher and a guide, but he also promised he would not leave us orphaned. He promised he would always be with us. He would never leave us or forsake us. If he is only here “in spirit” then his physical body is missing. The physical presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist means that Jesus is still the Word become flesh and he is still “God with us.”
During my many years in non-Catholic churches I often felt like something was missing. I realize now what it was. Most everything was spiritualized and subjective. There was less sense of how connected matter and spirit actually are. For example, The Lord’s Supper seemed like a very reverent Memorial Day ceremony. It was a time of remembering what Christ did 2000 years ago. Remembering is not a bad thing. Folks are typically quite moved during such services, as I was. Remembering is not the same as participating, however. Holy Communion is not ONLY for remembering what Jesus did, regardless of how moving it is to remember. Communion is for physical as well as spiritual communing with God and with each other.
The Mass is where Heaven descends to this material world and allows us to merge with it, not merely remember it. “…Thy will be done, on earth as it is in Heaven…Give us this day our daily bread…” It is the will of God that we on Earth be physically and spiritually connected to Heaven through the incarnate Christ, the Bread of Life. This happens DAILY all around the world in the Catholic Mass. This connection between Heaven and Earth is an objective one. That is, it happens whether or not the believers “feel” it happening. It is not a subjective experience that flows from how moved or inspired the participants are. Christ makes it effective, not the feelings of the believers. A vaccine “works” by virtue of its objective, physical connection to the patient. Similarly, the Holy Eucharist “works” by virtue of its objective, physical and spiritual connection to the recipient (not our subjective feelings, strong as they may be). Jesus saying, “Take and eat, take and drink” is like a doctor saying, “Take this medicine.”
So, these days, I think less about us going to Heaven and more about Heaven coming to heal us daily. One day, all things will be made new. Right now, the process is underway. We simply need to accept it and participate in it. Going to the doctor includes following the doctor’s orders to take your medicine. Accepting Christ includes following his command to eat his flesh and drink his blood. That’s how the spiritual merges with the material every day. That’s the incarnation, “God with us.” Christianity is as much about the material as it is the spiritual, because we are material and spiritual creations. That’s why all seven Sacraments matter, and that’s why matter matters to the Christian.
I’m excited about something we’re doing at our parish this Christmas. One of the men in our men’s group has been able to procure low cost copies of Scott and Kimberly Hahn’s book Rome Sweet Home. Hundreds of these books will be gift wrapped and given to people at Christmas Mass. The plan is to also give more of these books away at Easter.
There are so many people that only come to church on Christmas and Easter. This book may help some of them appreciate their faith more. Listening to the stories of converts is a great way to avoid taking the Faith for granted. Cradle Catholics often lack zeal and knowledge about their own Catholicism. Many are “culturally Catholic” with little or no sense of the historical, spiritual, life-giving power of Christ’s Church. It can be very enlightening to hear the logical and spiritual reasons for actually wanting to become Catholic. There are thousands of people and hundreds of families in our parish. We hope to get at least one book to most of these families.
The book was written by a married couple. They take turns describing their path from anti-Catholic, Evangelical Protestantism to Catholicism. Scott Hahn has become one of the most respected biblical scholars of our day. It is refreshing to hear the perspectives of both Scott and Kimberly as they explain their individual struggles as well as the challenges the journey presented to their marriage. I highly recommend the book to Catholic and non-Catholic readers.
So many Catholics are drifting away from the Church or going through the motions of being Catholic without really being in love with Christ or his Church. My prayer is that, by reading what people go through to find their way home to Catholicism, many Catholics will realize how good it is to already be home. Then they will have more desire to invite others home, too. I also hope non-Catholics will read the book and be inspired to make the journey home.
I know why it bothers people when Catholics make such a big deal about Mary. It used to bother me, too, even as I was being raised Catholic. God sent Jesus to take away our sins. Case closed. Why bother with anything else? So, Mary got picked out of billions of women to be the mother of Jesus. That’s why all generations are supposed to call her blessed, right? It’s like winning the lottery or something. “Wow, you’re so blessed to be chosen!” That was the end of it. Turns out that’s just part of the reason. There’s a lot more to Mary than a part in a Christmas play.
There are a lot of theological and scriptural implications about Mary that I simply did not know about. Learning those “technical” aspects of Marian doctrine really opened my eyes. Becoming a parent changed my outlook as well. I can only imagine being a mother, but being a father was enough to give me a greater appreciation for Mary’s role as a loving, sacrificial, devoted, holy parent.
Being a husband also contributed to my appreciation of Mary. One learns much about a spouse by getting to know one’s in-laws. Becoming part of a new family is life changing. As the saying goes, “You don’t just marry your spouse; you also marry your spouse’s family.” Knowing your spouse’s family contributes to knowing your spouse. It just makes sense that knowing the mother of Jesus would help a person know and love Jesus better. That’s how families generally work. No one lives in a vacuum. We all impact each other’s lives. The Church is a family, after all.
I understand my Protestant friends’ fear of idolatry, and I greatly respect it. I used to share it. The focus has to be on Jesus. I agree. It took me a long time to grasp the concept that devotion to Mary does not take anything away from Jesus. Indeed, Mary is the perfect model of complete devotion to Jesus. There is no other reason to acknowledge Mary except for the fact that she points us to her Son in all that she says and does. She is everything a disciple of Christ is supposed to be. She accepted Christ into her heart (and her body, thus becoming the Ark of the New Covenant) from before his birth until after his death and resurrection. She never left him. Her whole being is wrapped up in her love for Jesus. She is “full of grace.” She is what we are supposed to be. Her focus is always on her Son, Jesus.
Christians are supposed to love Jesus and follow Jesus. No human being ever loved Jesus more or followed Jesus better than Mary. That’s why Catholics have a devotion to her. It’s not because we think she can do something that Jesus can’t do. It’s not because we think she is equal to Jesus. It’s because we want to be as close to Jesus as possible, and she shows us how it is done. Can we be close to Jesus without getting to know Mary? Sure, but not as close. Mary is Jesus’ own flesh and blood. You can’t help but draw closer to Jesus by getting closer to Mary. It’s not an act of idolatry to talk to Mary. It’s not adding something “extra” to a relationship with Jesus. It’s being part of Jesus’ family. It’s about learning to know and love Jesus within the context of a family.
Incidentally, I have a great app on my phone that explains a lot about the Catholic perspective of Mary. If you have even the slightest interest in learning more about Mary, check it out. It is very comprehensive and easy to read.
The prevailing philosophy of our times seems to be that no one can really know truth. Truth is relative. Therefore, if one claims to know truth, one is often regarded as arrogant or narrow minded. Yet, there are some truths that are knowable, and everyone agrees with them. For example, it is not arrogant or narrow minded to know that the opposite of “false” is “true.”
I cannot personally claim to know everything that is true. I don’t know all truth. Some things must remain a mystery, at least for now. I do, however, know a man who claimed to know all truth. He actually claimed to be truth. His name is Jesus Christ. He is an historical figure who really lived and said lots of wild things. For example, he claimed to be God.
Jesus Christ also gathered lots of followers who believed what he taught, saw what he did, and sacrificed their lives to teach others about him. I can’t think of anyone more famous than Jesus Christ.
Some people regard Jesus as just a good teacher. They don’t believe he was really God or that he performed miracles. They just think he had some good things to say about love and morality. To them, he is simply one person on a long list of influential, religious teachers. Few people believe that Jesus was a “bad” person, although some believe he deceived people with phony “miracles.”
We come to a crossroads here. Jesus claimed to be God, the Creator of the universe. Why would a man make such a claim? Was he insane or delusional? Was he a liar and a charlatan? Was he telling the truth? If he really isn’t God, then he lied. Or, if he truly believed he was God but wasn’t, he was delusional. Those are the three choices. As many before me have noted, he was a liar, he was insane or he was God.
If he was a liar or a delusional person then there is no reason to call him a good, moral teacher. When someone addressed Jesus with the title, “Good Master,” Jesus responded, “Why do you call me good? Only God is good.” (Matt 19:16-17) In other words, “Don’t patronize me. Either you believe I’m God or you don’t.” If you don’t believe he is God, why bother calling him a “good teacher?” He wasn’t. He was a liar or a lunatic. Yet, millions of people want to tip their hats to the teachings of Jesus while simultaneously dismissing his divinity. Jesus is either true or false. It doesn’t work to have it both ways.
Consider also that Jesus started a Church. 2000 years later, that Church is still here, although empires have risen and fallen around it. Why? Why is Jesus’ Church still here? How has it managed to avoid destruction? The Church has suffered many attacks from within. Any other organization would have imploded long ago. The Church has suffered attacks from outside. People have tried to snuff out the Church from the beginning until today. Why have they failed? Why do governments and empires crumble while the Church lives on? Is this all due to just another “good,” lying, deceiving, delusional, religious teacher? Or is it due to God’s power?
If I believe that even some of the teachings of Jesus are “good” for me to follow, then I must dismiss that he was a liar or a lunatic, for liars and lunatics can’t be trusted. The remaining option is that his teachings are good because he told the truth. If he told the truth, then he is God and his Church is preserved by God. That means that the divine Jesus and the Church he preserves know better than I do about faith and morals.
When I encounter official teachings of the Church that are difficult to accept, it is not because Jesus and his Church are false. It is because there is something within me, for whatever reason, that resists the truth. Maybe it’s emotional, maybe it’s intellectual, but if I can’t accept the truth, the defect is somewhere in me. There is something in my heart, in my mind, or both that is obscuring my view of the truth that Jesus proclaims. It may be through no fault of my own, yet it is there, blocking my view.
Jesus did not say, “I know a way and I know the truth.” Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life.” These are the words of a liar, a lunatic, or the Lord God Almighty.
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”
Does this verse indicate that the Bible is all I need in order to be a good Christian? Does having only my Bible make me “thoroughly furnished” and “perfect” in my doctrine? “The word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword…” (Hebrews 4:12). But is a sword the only equipment a soldier requires to be “thoroughly furnished?” Is Paul telling Timothy, “All you need is your Bible?”
Soldiers require lots of things in order to be effective. Imagine the U.S.A. sending troops overseas with nothing but their rifles. The soldiers would have no training, no clothes, no helmets, no armor, no food, and no water. They might not even have proper officers. Sound silly? Well, it takes more than a sword to be fully equipped. However, soldiers with all the gear and provisions, but no rifles are also not fully equipped. Paul is not telling Timothy, “All you need is your Bible to be fully equipped.” He is telling Timothy, “In order to be “perfect” and “fully equipped,” you need to add the Bible to the rest of your essential gear.” The sword is profitable but not sufficient by itself.
Ephesians 6:13-17 sheds some light on this principle:
“Take unto you the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to withstand the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:”
The word of God, the sword of the Spirit, is not the only necessary item on the list. It is part of an ensemble. The Christian needs more than just a Bible. The Christian also needs “truth,” and “righteousness,” and “the gospel of peace,” and “faith,” and “salvation.” The Bible is not the “whole armor of God.” The Bible is one piece of essential equipment.
For example, if one has a Bible, but misinterprets it, then one’s loins are not girt with truth. Instead, one is wearing heresies and falsehoods. Heresies and falsehoods do not promote faith, righteousness, peace or salvation. They also help the wicked rather than quench the fiery darts of the wicked. How then, does one obtain truth from the scriptures?
The Apostle, Philip, saw a man sitting in his chariot reading scripture. Philip asked him, “Do you understand what you are reading? The man said, “How can I except some man should guide me?” (Acts 8:31) He had the same scriptures as Timothy, but he was obviously not “thoroughly furnished” with “the whole armor of God.” He did not yet have truth, or faith, or righteousness, or peace, or salvation. He needed a man with apostolic tradition and authority to teach him.
Paul says in 2Thess 2:15, “Stand fast, and hold the traditions which you have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.” Having the “sword” is not enough. A soldier must be properly trained to wield it. Otherwise, there is a good chance you will cut yourself or others. The Apostle Peter tells us that there are things in scripture that are hard to understand, and that untrained people use the scriptures to their own destruction (2Peter 3:16). We need the scriptures. However, to be thoroughly furnished, we also need proper training lest we fall upon our swords and slay ourselves.
Catholicism has it all. If you want to be “thoroughly furnished,” we have the scriptures and the truth, and the righteousness, and the gospel of peace, and the faith, and the salvation. We also have the authority to provide proper training free from heresies and falsehoods. It is the same authority used by Paul, Peter and Philip. It is the apostolic authority given by Christ himself. No other church has it all. Be “thoroughly furnished.” Be Catholic.
During my years spent in “once-saved-always-saved” churches, there was something lurking below the surface of the doctrine that I could not quite put my finger on. This morning it hit me. Although it is not intentional, there is a double standard. I certainly don’t mean to accuse anyone of malice or ill intent. It is simply a double standard that folks overlook. Most people that hold to “once-saved-always-saved” (OSAS) genuinely believe the doctrine and are well-intentioned in spreading it. They want to go to Heaven and take as many people with them as they can. That’s not a bad thing. They mean well. They sincerely love Jesus.
When King David committed adultery and murder, he was not “dethroned.” He remained King, not because of his good behavior, but because he was God’s anointed. When Moses was disobedient, he was punished but not “removed from office.” He remained the leader of Israel until he died because he was chosen by God to be the leader. When the Pharisees became hypocrites and made the Word of God of no effect Jesus did not say, “You have been bad, so you no longer have any authority.” Instead, Jesus told the people, “Do what the Pharisees tell you because they sit on the seat of Moses. Just don’t be hypocrites like they are.” Peter said the “wrong thing” prompting Jesus to refer to him as “Satan.” Then Peter denied Jesus three times during his trial. Despite this bad behavior Peter was still chosen by God to infallibly write letters that would become part of the inerrant, God-breathed, Holy Bible.
Regarding their own salvation, OSAS folks will say, “It doesn’t matter what I do, I can’t lose my salvation because nothing can separate me from the love of God. I am sealed unto the day of redemption. I am justified (meaning, it is “just as if” I had never sinned). Once God decides to save me it’s a done deal. I may lose rewards in Heaven for bad behavior, but I’ll never lose my salvation. God has the power to preserve my soul!”
However, that same, steadfast, preservative power of God is never seen as applied to the Catholic Church. To the OSAS folks (and Protestantism in general), the Catholic Church cannot be the one true Church established by Jesus Christ due to “bad behavior.” Whether it is the Crusades, the Inquisition, the selling of indulgences, the Galileo ordeal or the more recent priest abuse scandals, people insist that such behavior disqualifies Catholicism from being Christ’s Church. In other words, God can keep King David and even individual Christians intact, but not his own Church. The Church had to be scrapped and “started over” because it just wasn’t working out. So, the Old Covenant was replaced by the New Covenant Church, and the New Covenant Church was replaced by the “New” New Covenant Church in the 1500s. God’s grace and the Holy Spirit just couldn’t handle the behavior of Catholics.
Nevertheless, OSAS Christians (and Protestantism in general) accept the Catholic Church’s formation of the New Testament canon. The New Testament, as compiled and authorized by the Catholic Church, is accepted as the God-breathed, inspired, inerrant Word of God. But, because of the bad behavior of some Catholics, the Catholic Church was “dethroned” as God’s anointed and replaced by lots of different “churches” with various doctrines and practices. The office of the papacy, which once oversaw and authorized the compilation of Holy Scripture, no longer has authority. This is the double standard. It seems that the Holy Spirit and God’s grace are able to work with everybody’s bad behavior except for the Catholic Church.
The Holy Spirit-led Catholic Church allegedly gave us the New Testament and then suddenly turned into “The Whore of Babylon” at worst, or an “outdated, out of touch denomination” at best. Personally, I believe God is more powerful and more gracious than that. He is powerful enough to establish a Church with offices of leadership, and then preserve that Church until the end of time, just as he preserves the Scriptures compiled by that Church.
We need not apply the words of Christ, “I will never leave you nor forsake you” only to individual Christians. Those words also apply to the Church Jesus established, the Catholic Church. Jesus has not left the Church, but many of us have. Some of us have met Christ’s Church, but we have not met Christ. Some of us have met Christ, but we have not genuinely met his Church. Many people have only been introduced to a caricature of the Church propagated by anti-Catholic teachings, poor catechesis or simple misunderstandings.
Christ and his Church go together. We are incomplete with one but not the other. Where there are human beings there will always be sin. Nevertheless, “Once-Christ’s-Church-always-Christ’s-Church” holds true because of Jesus, not because of us.
It’s a bit like being stranded on a roof during a flood. You see the helicopter coming and shout, “I’m saved!” Well, you’re not in the chopper yet, and the chopper hasn’t landed yet, so, as old Treebeard would say, “Let’s not be hasty.”
Good essay here about how a Catholic can respond to the question, “Are You Saved?”